Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia

Author:

Indra MexsasaiORCID,Saragih Geofani MilthreeORCID,Muhtar Mohamad HidayatORCID

Abstract

This research discusses the strength of the Constitutional Court's decision regarding judicial review in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court is an institution of judicial power tasked with exercising the authority of judicial review born from the 3rd Amendment to the 1945 Constitution. In this study, the philosophical and normative foundations that form the basis for the strength of the Constitutional Court's decision to conduct judicial review will be discussed. The method used is normative juridical, using secondary materials such as laws, decisions of the Constitutional Court, and related legal literature. This study's results confirm that the Constitutional Court's decision to conduct a judicial review has a powerful dimension of power. This power can be viewed from several angles, both philosophical and normative. In the philosophical aspect, the strength of the Constitutional Court's decision lies in the principles of popular sovereignty and constitutional supremacy. While in the normative aspect, the strength of the Constitutional Court's decision is based on the provisions of laws and regulations governing the authority and procedures of the Constitutional Court in conducting judicial reviews.

Publisher

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Ahmad, Ahmad, and Novendri M. Nggilu. “Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 4 (2019): 785–808.

2. Alfana, Nano Tresna. “Sekjen MK: Pelaksanaan Putusan MK Memperlihatkan Kualitas Bernegara Hukum | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Accessed May 22, 2023. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=15268&menu=2.

3. Alfana, Nano Tresna “Wahiduddin Adams Ungkap Adanya Ketidakpatuhan Terhadap Putusan MK | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia,” 2022. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=18355&menu=2.

4. Almalibari, Khotob Tobi, Abdul Aziz, and Adrian Febriansyah. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 1 (April 12, 2021): 1–8.

5. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan, Mahkamah Konsititusi, 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3