Conflict actors influence the dynamics of agropastoral policies to accommodate their preferences and expectations in Ghana

Author:

Brobbey Lawrence KwabenaORCID,Agyei Frank Kwaku,Osei-Tutu Paul,Kyereh Boateng

Abstract

In many sub-Saharan African countries, numerous studies ascribe biases and inconsistencies in agropastoral policies to the perennial farmer–herder conflicts. However, insights into the assumptions underlying agropastoral policies and the strategies that actors involved in the conflict use to influence these policies are limited in countries with high incidence of such conflicts. We engaged the ‘act of governmentality’ (ways of governing) to examine how agropastoral policies in Ghana from colonial to contemporary times have influenced farmer–herder conflicts, and examined the strategies used by key conflict actors to influence the agropastoral policy process. Data were collected through documentary review, interviews, focus group discussions and facilitated workshops with a range of conflict actors such as farmers, pastoralists, chiefs, farmer and herder associations, and public officials. Our analyses indicated that whereas the colonial administration facilitated cattle ranching among natives of the Gold Coast, the postcolonial administration changed the approach by adopting a seemingly hostile strategy that largely neglected pastoralism for almost five decades. The state now favours sedentarisation, an approach that has been rebuffed by many farmers, farming communities, and some pastoralists. Policy inconsistencies have created tensions and a dynamic struggle across spatial scales, with each actor coalition employing diverse strategies to influence agropastoral policies to accommodate their preferences and expectations. The outcome of each policy cycle became an input for further contestation in a resource-depleting process that failed to produce equitable outcomes. Achieving a sustainable negotiated solution requires moving beyond the current segmentation towards well-structured and inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue that allows for proper consideration of all actors’ concerns.

Funder

Danish Fellowship Center

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Reference56 articles.

1. Pastoralism and violence in Northern Ghana: socialisation and professional requirement.;International Journal of Research in Social Sciences,2014

2. Agyemang E (2017) Farmer–Herder Conflict in Africa: an Assessment of the Causes and Effects of the Sedentary Farmers–Fulani Herdsmen Conflict : a Case Study of the Agogo Traditional Area, Ashanti Region of Ghana. XII. Available at

3. Dynamics of herd structures and herding strategies in West Africa: a study of market integration and ecological adaptation.;Africa,1995

4. The political ecology of peasant–herder conflicts in the Northern Ivory Coast.;Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1988

5. Forum shopping and shopping forums: dispute processing in a Minangkabau village in west Sumatra.;Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law,1981

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3