Abstract
Private health insurance membership declined
steadily between 1984 and 1997, after which
major government interventions caused it to
increase. We review some of the literature and
conclude that the increases in membership were
probably associated with a loss of equity and costeffectiveness
for the health care system as a
whole.
We attempt to explain why the government made
the changes and conclude that the main factors
were vested interests of those who have benefited
and a confusion of objectives.
The changes may have resulted in a more balanced
use of available resources (such as the
balance between government and private hospital
utilisation) but these and other desirable objectives
might have been better achieved in other
ways. We advocate that a more serious effort be
made in future to ensure that policy takes more
account of evidence, logic, and system-wide
design and coherence.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献