Managing conflict between nesting common terns and herring gulls

Author:

Sullivan Jeffery D.ORCID,O’Donnell Amy W.,Lescure Lauren M.,Rapp Andrew J.,Callahan Carl R.,McGowan Peter C.,Carney Tim,Prosser Diann J.ORCID

Abstract

Context Due to the frequent depredation of eggs and chicks by herring gulls (Larus argentatus), numerous approaches to reduce their impact on tern colonies have been tested by wildlife managers. Previous studies have shown that the use of overhead lines presents a promising method to prevent gull nesting in tern colonies, but little work has evaluated if this approach is suitable for excluding both nesting and non-nesting gulls. Aims The goal of this study was to explore the efficacy of a preventative approach, overhead lines, versus a more widely practiced lethal approach, shooting and trapping. Specifically, we aimed to determine if methods differ in their abilities to deter both gull nesting and presence within treatment areas and identify impacts on common tern (Sterna hirundo) nesting within treatment areas. Methods We applied separate management strategies to two common tern colonies. In one colony, we removed herring gulls via shooting followed by trapping and nest removal, and in the other colony, we erected overhead lines with subsequent trapping at nests established in the treatment area. Key results Gulls appeared to adapt quickly to shooting efforts, limiting efficacy and resulting in no significant change in abundance from pre-treatment levels (P = 0.981). However, gull use of both the colony and surrounding brush declined significantly (P < 0.001) following trapping and nest removal. Meanwhile, the number of gulls in the colony area declined from a pre-treatment average of 56 to only six, following the erection of overhead lines (P < 0.001). Although six gull nests were established within the treatment area (overhead lines), they were not replaced once the parents were trapped and nests destroyed. Conclusions Tern nesting appeared to be unaffected by any of the implemented management activities. Our data suggest that overhead lines may present an alternative to lethal control when seeking to minimise the impacts of gulls on tern colonies. Implications The data presented in this manuscript can be used to guide managers in selecting actions to reduce conflict between gulls and breeding common terns. By using data-informed practices, managers can select the method best suited for their specific needs and priorities.

Funder

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference32 articles.

1. Introduction: a historical perspective on trends in some gulls in eastern North America, with reference to other regions.;Waterbirds,2016

2. Arnold JM, Oswald SA, Nisbet ICT, Pyle P, Patten MA (2020) Common tern (). Birds of the World. Available at [Accessed October 2022]

3. Gulls in urban environments: landscape-level management to reduce conflict.;Landscape and Urban Planning,1997

4. Early loss of herring gull clutches after egg-oiling.;Wildlife Society Bulletin,2000

5. Monofilament lines exclude ring-billed gulls from traditional nesting areas.;Bird Control Seminars Proceedings,1983

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3