Abstract
Summary. The nutritive value of extrusa samples
collected from oesophageal fistulated cattle can be an unreliable indicator of
the quality of the diet of resident cattle grazing the same pasture. This is
largely because the botanical composition of the extrusa from 15–30 min
of grazing may differ from that of the whole diet of the resident cattle. A
methodology is described whereby the reliability of some attributes of diet
quality can be improved by correcting for differences between the
C3/C4 proportions of extrusa
samples and the dietary C3/C4
proportions of resident cattle derived from their faecal
δ13C values.
Examples from 23 paddock samplings covering 2 sites, 3 experiments and 6
sampling occasions, are used to illustrate the application of the methodology.
Carbon ratios (δ13C) of the naturally occurring
isotopes 12C and 13C were used as
an index of legume (C3)/grass
(C4) proportions in extrusa samples and in the diet of
resident cattle assuming dietary δ13C =
faecal δ13C + 1. Regression relationships
were developed relating the nitrogen, mineral and digestibility levels of
extrusa samples to extrusa δ13C values. Where
appropriate, these relationships were then used to estimate the level of these
attributes in the diet of resident cattle from their estimated dietary
δ13C values. Nitrogen and calcium concentrations
in extrusa were usually closely related to legume content
(δ13C) so that adjustments were considered very
advantageous with average RSDs of 0.08 and 0.09% for calcium and
nitrogen respectively. Boron and sulfur concentrations were also related to
legume content but only at 1 of 2 sites. There was no apparent relationship
between legume content and the concentrations of aluminium, copper, magnesium,
manganese, selenium, titanium and zinc at either site. In general,
in vitro digestibility of extrusa samples was poorly
related to legume content.
The use of alkane technology is suggested as a more versatile alternative to
the carbon ratio technique and the benefits and limitations of the proposed
methodology are discussed briefly.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献