Abstract
Context Forage–livestock systems contribute to Brazilian greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, harming the environment and reducing bioeconomic efficiency. Employing technologies like pasture management is crucial for sustainable mitigation. Aims Our objective was to measure greenhouse gas emissions of beef cattle in forage systems by exploring well-managed Brachiaria hybrid pastures in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. Methods The experimental design was a randomised complete block, with two cultivars: Ipyporã and Mulato II, in four replicates, totalling eight experimental units, and each experimental unit was 1.5 ha. Key results Ipyporã pastures had 88.5% greater herbage mass than Mulato II in January (8350 vs 4430 kg dry mass ha−1). There was no difference between cultivars for soil GHG emissions. The greatest enteric methane and carbon dioxide values were measured in February. In Ipyporã pastures, the average daily gain was 57% and 50% greater than in Mulato II, in February (837 vs 533 g day−1) and March (1054 vs 700 g day−1) respectively. Enteric methane and carbon dioxide were 34% and 48% less respectively in Ipyporã pastures in February. Conclusions Soil GHG emissions in fertilised pastures followed similar patterns across different cultivars, but those with greater production tended to produce more emissions (soil and enteric) due to fertilisation and increased stocking rates. Implications Forage–livestock production systems benefit from adequate grazing and pasture management of two Brachiaria cultivars, resulting in greater productivity compared to GHG emissions. This leads to reduced emissions per unit of product, contributing to the development of a more efficient and sustainable forage–livestock system.
Funder
Associação para o Fomento à Pesquisa de Melhoramento de Forrageiras
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril
Associação dos Criadores do Norte de Mato Grosso
Reference53 articles.
1. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil.;Meteorologische Zeitschrift,2013
2. AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis of the AOAC.’ (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA)
3. Argel PJ, Miles JW, Guiot JD, Cuadrado H, Lascano CE (2007) ‘Cultivar Mulato II (Brachiaria hybrid CIAT 36087): A high-quality forage grass, resistant to spittlebugs and adapted to well-drained, acid tropical soils.’ (International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT): Cali, Colombia) Available at
4. Nitrous oxide, methane, and ammonia emissions from cattle excreta on growing in monoculture or silvopasture with and .;Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2020
5. Biological nitrification inhibition by grasses mitigates soil nitrous oxide emissions from bovine urine patches.;Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017