Abstract
Background The prediction accuracy for the rate of surface fire spread varies in different regions; thus, increasing the prediction accuracy for local fuel types to reduce the destructive consequences of fire is critically needed. Aims The objective of this study is to improve the Rothermel model’s accuracy in predicting the ROS for surface fuel burning in planted forests of Pinus koraiensis in the eastern mountains of north-east China. Methods Fuel beds with various fuel loads and moisture content was constructed on a laboratory burning bed, 276 combustion experiments were performed under multiple slope conditions, and the ROS data from the combustion experiments were used to modify the related parameters in the Rothermel model. Results The surface fire spread rate in Pinus koraiensis plantations was directly predicted using the Rothermel model but had significant errors. The Rothermel model after modification predicted the following: MRE = 25.09%, MAE = 0.46 m min−1, and R2 = 0.80. Conclusion The prediction accuracy of the Rothermel model was greatly enhanced through parameter tuning based on in-lab combustion experiments Implications This study provides a method for the local application of the Rothermel model in China and helps with forest fire fighting and management in China.
Funder
High-level/excellent doctoral talents introduction scientific research start-up project of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University under Grant
National Key Research and Development Program of China
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reference62 articles.
1. Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia.;Communications Earth & Environment,2021
2. Albini FA (1976) Estimating wildfire behaviour and effects. Vol. 30. (Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station)
3. Albini FA (1976) Computer-based models of wildland fire behaviour: a user’s manual. (Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture)
4. Limitations on the accuracy of model predictions of wildland fire behaviour: a state-of-the-knowledge overview.;Forestry Chronicle,2013
5. Anderson HE (1982) Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. General Technical Report INT-122. (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station)