Author:
Viegas D. Xavier,Bovio Giovanni,Ferreira Almerindo,Nosenzo Antonio,Sol Bernard
Abstract
Five methods for the evaluation of fire danger, based on meteorological
factors, were tested using statistical data for daily number of fires and
burned area from six different regions in France, Italy and Portugal, for a
period of 3-9 years, both for Winter and Summer fires. A normalised scale for
the output of the various methods was adopted to compare the variation of
number of fires and burned area predicted by each method. Based on a
statistical test, the relative performance of the various methods is assessed.
From the five methods that were analysed in this research, the Canadian and
the modified Nesterov methods showed the best overall performance.
Cited by
202 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献