Abstract
Objective To examine the potential therapeutic value of new medicines approved in the US and both approved and not approved in Australia. Methods A list of new medicines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 was assembled and it was determined which of these medicines were also approved in Australia. Three metrics – first in class, priority review and therapeutic rating by two independent organisations – were used to determine the potential therapeutic value of the medicines. The percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value was compared using each of the three metrics. Results A total of 273 drugs were approved by the FDA, of which 147 (53.8%) were approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the Australian regulator. For each of these three metrics, the percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value approved in Australia was the same: first in class (yes vs no: Chi-squared P = 0.8562), priority review (yes vs no: Chi-squared P = 0.4593), therapeutic rating (major/moderate vs little/no: Chi-squared P = 0.9006). Some of the 126 drugs not approved may be therapeutically important. Conclusions New medicines approved in the US between 2015 and 2020 without potential significant therapeutic value are as likely to be introduced into Australia as drugs with potential significant therapeutic value. Some potentially valuable drugs may not have been submitted for approval in Australia by the companies making them.
Reference14 articles.
1. Medicines Australia. Medicines matter: Australia’s access to medicines 2015–2020. Deakin: ACT; 2021.
2. Association between FDA and EMA expedited approval programs and therapeutic value of new medicines: retrospective cohort study.;BMJ,2020
3. Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science. R&D briefing 81: new drug approvals in six major authorities 2011-2020: focus on facilitated regulatory pathways and worksharing. London: Centre for innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS); 2020. Available at
4. Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. Human drug advisory panel. 2015. Available at
5. Health Canada’s use of its priority review process for new drugs: a cohort study.;BMJ Open,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献