Author:
Dorado J.,Gálvez M. J.,Demyda-Peyrás S.,Ortiz I.,Morrell J. M.,Crespo F.,Gósalvez J.,Hidalgo M.
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy of simple sperm washing (SW), single-layer centrifugation (SLC) and modified swim-up (SU) techniques in the preparation of dog spermatozoa for cooling. Eighteen ejaculates, collected from three dogs (six per dog), were pooled (three ejaculates per pool) and divided into three aliquots: (1) one aliquot was washed and cooled at 5°C for 72 h, considered as control (SW-control), (2) the second aliquot was selected by SLC through Androcoll-C and subsequently cooled in the same way as the SW-control samples (SLC-AC) and (3) the last aliquot was selected by a modified SU method with Androcoll-C and cooled as mentioned above (SU-AC). Assessment of sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm membrane integrity and acrosome integrity were performed on aliquots of fresh semen and chilled–rewarmed samples. Sperm membrane integrity and progressive motility were significantly (P < 0.05) improved by SU-AC compared with SW-control. Morphological sperm abnormalities decreased significantly (P < 0.001) in SLC-AC samples compared with SW-control samples. These sperm variables did not differ between SLC-AC and SU-AC methods (P > 0.05). The recovery rates were not significantly (P > 0.05) different between SW-control, SLC-AC and SU-AC samples. Our results confirm that SU-AC may be a successful method for the preparation of dog spermatozoa for cooling.
Subject
Developmental Biology,Endocrinology,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Reproductive Medicine,Biotechnology
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献