FRESHWATER INFLUX IN THE GIPPSLAND BASIN: IMPACT ON FORMATION EVALUATION, HYDROCARBON VOLUMES, AND HYDROCARBON MIGRATION

Abstract

The recognition and quantitative evaluation of hydrocarbon zones in the Gippsland Basin is complicated by the presence of a freshwater aquifer system. This aquifer system has been verified and documented using data obtained from wireline logs. The presence of freshwater aquifers below the hydrocarbon sands leads to (i) difficulty in distinguishing the hydrocarbon zones from the water sands using well logs, and (ii) difficulty in determining accurate water saturation values used in estimating hydrocarbon volumes.Water saturations calculated from logs require the input of a formation water salinity. In conventional log analysis the formation water salinity in the hydrocarbon zones is assumed to be the same as that of the underlying water sands. In reservoirs in the Gippsland Basin underlain by freshwater aquifers, calculated water saturations using the salinities of the water sands are inconsistent with capillary pressure, Repeat Formation Tester (RFT*-Schlumberger), and production test data. All available evidence suggests that the formation water salinities within the hydrocarbon zones are significantly greater than in the freshwater aquifers. The water saturations derived using the higher salinity values lead to the calculation of greater hydrocarbon volumes.The occurrence of saline formation waters within the hydrocarbon zones leads to the interpretation that significant volumes of hydrocarbon were emplaced prior to the formation of the freshwater aquifer system. Subsequent freshwater influx did not flush the emplaced hydrocarbons.