A new device to reduce mammal predation on reptiles in pitfall traps

Author:

Stiglingh Andrea D.ORCID,Moseby Katherine E.,Neave GeorginaORCID,Beerkens Nathan,Tuft KatherineORCID

Abstract

Context Many vertebrate studies report predation from pit co-occupants as a source of mortality during pitfall surveys. Aims This study aims to assess the use of false-floors in pitfall traps to reduce the opportunistic predation of small reptiles by small mammals caught within the same pit. Methods Small-vertebrate surveys were conducted using pitfall traps in an arid landscape from 1998 to 2021. Between 2018 and 2021, wooden false-floors with 2 cm notches in their sides were placed inside pitfall traps to reduce the amount of reptile predation caused by small mammals co-occupying the same pit. The position of captured individuals, relative to the false-floor, were used to assess the capacity of false-floors to create an effective barrier between captured reptiles and mammals. Key results During the false-floor trial period (2018–2021), Pseudomys australis and Notomys alexis were identified as the key mammal species opportunistically predating on captured reptiles, collectively accounting for 54% of reptile predation incidents. Most of the N. alexis and P. australis captures were found above false-floors (92 and 70% of captures respectively), indicating that they were generally not able to access the prey refuge beneath. Reptile mortality from small mammal predation was significantly lower in pitfalls with false-floors (15% of reptile-mammal co-occupancy incidents) than in those without (60% of co-occupancy incidents). However, false-floors did not prevent all predation events because some mammals were able to access the compartment underneath the false-floors. Conclusions The false-floors provided an effective barrier between small reptiles and key mammal species caught in the same pit and reduced occurrences of small reptile predation. Implications False-floors can effectively be used as a tool to reduce reptile mortality during pitfall surveys. However, they also increased the time taken to set and check traps and we therefore suggest their use only during times of high mammal abundances, when the abundance of large rodents is high. The efficacy of false-floors at any particular site may be improved by trialling different-sized notches and construction materials.

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Reference24 articles.

1. Field test of the SMED, a small mammal escape device for pitfall trapping amphibians.;Northwestern Naturalist,2000

2. Clemann N (2006) Distribution and ecology of the swamp skink in the Port Phillip and Western Port region. Report to Melbourne Water. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.

3. Trapping efficiency and associated mortality of incidentally captured small mammals during herpetofaunal surveys of temporary wetlands.;Wildlife Society Bulletin,2014

4. A device for excluding predators from pitfall traps.;Herpetological Review,2006

5. Fisher RN, Rochester CJ (2012) Pitfall-trap surveys. In ‘Reptile biodiversity: standard methods for inventory and monitoring’. (Eds RW McDiarmid, MS Foster, C Guyer, JW Gibons, N Chernoff) pp. 234–249. (University of California Press: CA, USA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3