Abstract
Context Leiopelma archeyi is a threatened New Zealand amphibian species translocated for conservation purposes. A disease outbreak triggered the translocation of 70 frogs to Pureora Forest in 2006 to establish a new wild population of L. archeyi. Ten years after, 60 more frogs were translocated to this site to enhance the genetic and demographic profile of L. archeyi in Pureora Forest. Here, we analysed 14 years of capture–recapture monitoring data collected for this translocated population. Aims Our aim was to estimate population demographic parameters that allow us to assess the demographic performance of this translocated population. Methods We used spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR; also called spatial capture–recapture) multi strata/session models to estimate population density and derive its rate of change over time. Key results Here we show that the density of translocated Leiopelma archeyi in Pureora (central North Island, New Zealand) remains stable for most of the study period. After the release of 70 frogs in 2006, density varied from 0.02 frogs/m2 in April 2007 to 0.06 frogs/m2 in December 2014. After the second release of 60 frogs in 2016, density in Pureora of L. archeyi varied from 0.21 frogs/m2 in November 2016 to 0.63 frogs/m2 in November 2018. Conclusions The study species is a long-lived k-selected species, therefore long-term monitoring (>20 years) is required to corroborate demographic indicators. Nevertheless, as the current density estimates are higher than the density estimated for this population after each release (April 2007 and November 2016), we suggest progress towards the establishment of a new wild population of L. archeyi in Pureora Forest. Implications Translocations are a useful conservation tool for many threatened species and post-release monitoring data are the main source of information needed to empirically prove their success.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference85 articles.
1. Dispersal and population state of an endangered island lizard following a conservation translocation.;Ecological Applications,2018
2. Armstrong DP, Reynolds MH (2012) Modelling reintroduced populations: the state of art and future directions. In ‘Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management’. (Eds J Ewen, DP Armstrong, KA Parker, PJ Seddon) pp. 165–222. (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.: Chichester)
3. Bailey LL, Nichols JD (2010) Capture-mark–recapture, removal, and occupancy models. In ‘Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques’. (Ed. CK Dodd Jr.) pp. 447–463. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York)
4. Estimating survival and breeding probability for pond-breeding amphibians: a modified robust design.;Ecology,2004
5. Comparing population size estimators for plethodontid salamanders.;Journal of Herpetology,2004