Community participation in Australia’s National Suicide Prevention Trial

Author:

King KylieORCID,Hall Teresa,Oostermeijer Sanne,Currier Dianne

Abstract

Background National systems-based suicide prevention approaches are increasingly being implemented. Community participation is fundamental to the successful implementation of these approaches, but can be challenging to undertake. We present findings from the evaluation of Australia’s National Suicide Prevention Trial (the Trial). Methods We completed consultations with 127 community members and 46 Primary Health Network (PHN) staff. Thematic analysis was undertaken to understand the process of community participation in the planning and implementation of the Trial. Results Themes were identified regarding: a collaborative PHN; an engaged and passionate community; maintaining engagement; getting the right people involved; and getting stakeholders to work together. Continuous negotiation about Trial ownership, acceptability of the Trial model, and choice of activities was required. Community participation was somewhat challenging for PHNs, taking much longer than anticipated for a range of reasons. Conclusions Future system-based approaches could benefit from the provision of community participation skills training and support to enable a more coordinated, and perhaps more easily achieved, approach to the involvement of community. Despite a long process of relationship building between stakeholders, this led to improved community cohesion and integration in local suicide prevention, ready for future collaborative work.

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference18 articles.

1. Australian Government Department of Health (2017) National Suicide Prevention Trial Evaluation Framework. Australian Government Department of Health: Canberra, ACT, Australia.

2. Black Dog Insitute (2021) The National Suicide Prevention Trial: Insights and Impact. (Black Dog Institute: Sydney, NSW, Australia) Available at [Verified 3 March 2022]

3. The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy.;Australian Journal of Public Administration,2018

4. Using thematic analysis in psychology.;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

5. Evaluating community participation: a comparison of participatory approaches in the planning and implementation of new primary health‐care services in northern Australia.;International Journal of Health Planning and Management,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3