Author:
Cunningham G. P.,Harden J.
Abstract
Summary. Conventional pesticide spraying in citrus crops
with low-profile sprayers results in pest management problems because of the
poor distribution of pesticide throughout the tree. Pesticide losses,
particularly drift, are a concern with this type of sprayer especially in
orchards situated in or near urban areas.
The spray deposit on citrus leaves and fruit and off-target losses (canopy
run-off and drift) were determined for air-assisted low-profile sprayers and
air-assisted sprayers fitted with tower air conveyors (air-towers).
The air-tower sprayers produced even distribution of leaf spray deposits
through the full height of the tree canopy while the low-profile sprayers
produced decreasing leaf spray deposits with increasing height in the trees.
The Metters tower sprayer and Cropliner low-profile sprayer resulted in
increasing deposits from the 0˚ axis through to the 90˚ axis to
sprayer travel while the Barlow tower sprayer and the Hardi low-profile
sprayer produced a more even distribution of deposits through the axes to
sprayer travel. Fruit deposits were not significantly different between
sprayers. The Barlow tower sprayer produced significantly less canopy spray
run-off compared with the low-profile sprayers. The Barlow tower sprayer
resulted in a significant reduction in spray drift in the above tree zone
compared with the Hardi low-profile sprayer.
Better distribution of pesticides in citrus tree canopies will improve pest
control especially in the top sections of the tree as this is where the
greatest increase in pesticide deposit is achieved with air-tower sprayers.
Both ground and air contamination from pesticides can also be reduced by using
sprayers fitted with air-tower conveyors designed to produce even airflows for
the full height of the citrus trees being sprayed.
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献