What do general practitioners consider support? Findings from a local pilot initiative

Author:

Sankaranarayanan Anoop,Allanson Kerry,Arya Dinesh K.

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a local pilot that was aimed to assess if making a local psychiatrist available would improve GP satisfaction with regard to responsiveness and access to specialist mental health services. A psychiatrist was made available via a telephone advice line for 1 h every day. Pre- and post-survey of all GPs was conducted to elicit GP satisfaction and suggestions. The pilot was conducted from Maitland, the base of Hunter Valley Mental Health Service. A total of 202 GPs in the area were contacted and surveyed; 17% responded to the pre-survey and 27% to the post-survey. Only 8% of the GPs used the telephone advice service. Despite low use, most responding GPs indicated that they would like to see the services continue. Most of the responding GPs (both users and non-users of this service) were not aware of or had not used the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ GP Psych Support initiative. Results from this pilot indicate that making a local psychiatrist available improves GP satisfaction with regard to responsiveness and access, despite low use. Further research is needed to establish if such a service can be made available at an area level and whether this would be cost effective.

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3