Abstract
Context Concentrate supplementation at high rates represents a method used to improve the productive efficiency of the beef cattle grazing system. Further, the use of additives increases the nutrient-use efficiency of diets. In this sense, it is important to determine the impact of additives in grazing beef cattle fed with high-concentrate supplements to determine the appropriate management practices of the system. Aim This study aimed to evaluate the feeding behaviour of Nellore beef cattle (Bos taurus indicus) in intensive finishing on pasture and fed with different additives. Methods Twenty-eight Nellore cattle [with initial bodyweight (BW) of 480 ± 5 kg and age of 24 ± 2 months] were finished on Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã pastures. The animals were assigned to a completely randomised design with four experimental supplements: U (urea as non-protein nitrogen source), UO (slow-release urea partially replacing urea), UOL (supplement UO + Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast), and UOLP (supplement UOL + multi-strain probiotics). Key results Supplement intake and idleness time were most affected by the season (P < 0.001). The total dry-matter intake was higher in UOLP (P < 0.004), and this supplement also produced the least effects on feeding behaviour. Conclusion The beginning of the rains affected the feeding behaviour. The additive combination in intensive finishing on pasture, such as UOL and UOLP, improved the intake and did not affect the feeding behaviour during the day. Implications These results indicate that the use of additives in intensive finishing on pasture improves productive efficiency and does not change the animal’s behaviour, resulting in an important technology to be disseminated and applied by grazing beef cattle producers.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference45 articles.
1. Effects of varying forage types on milk production responses to whole cottonseed, tallow, and yeast.;Journal of Dairy Science,1995
2. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals.;Grass and Forage Science,2011
3. AOAC (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 15th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington DC, USA)
4. AOAC (2005) ‘Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists.’ 18th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc.: Gaithersburg, MD, USA)
5. Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation.;Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献