Abstract
Current classifications of subfamily Myrmicinae stem from the work of Emery,
most recently formulated in 1922. With the exception of a few well-defined tribes, the
remainder (and bulk) of the Myrmicinae is composed of alarge group of genera exhibiting
close phyletic relationships and many bewildering series of convergences. These genera
previously have not been clearly defined and classified due to the too-frequent use of
superficial habitus characters. The present paper examines new, as well as old disused,
taxonomic characters, especially meristic ones, and applies these to a critical analysis
of tribes Solenopsidini and Pheidologetini of authors. The old conventional tribal
groupings prove to have little utility, and pending a re-examination of the remainder of
the Myrmicinae, the use of informal genus groups is recommended. Replacing the two
traditional tribes are four genus groups, related respectively to Monomorium, Megalomyrmex,
Solenopsis, and Pheidologeton, and a number of genera are excluded from these
groups. All the genera are redefined with extensive synonymies. All the currently
unchallenged species-level names in these genera are listed with bibliographic citations,
and a brief review is given of the present status of larval taxonomy.
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献