Abstract
In an attempt to resolve
discrepancies between association constants obtained from solubility and
absorbance measurements for thallium(1) chloride and bromide the explicit
assumptions used in the various analyses have been considered in detail. It is shown that the discrepancies can be
accounted for in part by considering the activity coefficient of the complex TlCl or TIBr, and, more
importantly, by allowing for the presence of small amounts of higher complexes
in analysing absorbance data. It is also shown, in
determining association constants using a specific ionic activity coefficient
expression, that uncertainties in some interaction coefficients reduce the
usefulness of our solubility measurements in non-common ion salts. In
particular, it is concluded, using the specific ionic interaction coefficient
expression, that association constants can at present only be arrived at from
solubility measurements by specifying arbitrary interaction coefficients for
thallium(1) and halide ions; and to obtain association constants using a
non-specific ionic activity coefficient expression it is necessary to assume
unnecessarily arbitrary subsidiary association reactions as well as an arbitrary value
for the activity coefficient parameter B.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献