Abstract
Scope of practice regulation in medicine is crucial for ensuring patient safety, access to care and professional autonomy. This paper explores the impact of scope of practice regulation on healthcare delivery, professional responsibilities and patient outcomes. It discusses the variability in standards for safe practice, the challenges in defining boundaries between medical specialties and the recent controversies in cosmetic surgery practice. The paper also examines the potential benefits and drawbacks of rigorous scope of practice regulations, including their impact on clinical innovation, flexibility and access to care. Furthermore, it delves into the implications of defensive medicine and the consequences of restrictive regulations on patient care. The author proposes implementing a proactive, national, artificial intelligence-powered, real-time outcome monitoring system to address these challenges. This system aims to cover every patient undergoing a surgical procedure and could be gradually extended to non-surgical conditions, benefiting all key stakeholders in the health system. The paper emphasises the need for a balanced approach to scope of practice regulation to avoid stifling clinical innovation and professional autonomy, while ensuring patient safety and professional accountability.
Reference12 articles.
1. Oral Surgeons as Cosmetic Surgeons and Their Scope of Practice.;Plast Reconst Surg,2019
2. ABC. Videos show ‘dangerous’ practices in Daniel Lanzer’s cosmetic surgery clinics, plastic surgeons say. Australian Broadcasting Corporation; 2021. Available at [cited 17 January 2024].
3. AHPRA. Endorsement of registered medical practitioner registration for the approved area of cosmetic surgery. Medical Board of Australia/Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency; 2023. Available at
4. Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Surgeons) Amendment Act 2023. Queensland Government; 2023, Available at
5. Becoming the Standard: How Innovative Procedures Benefitting Public Health Are Incorporated Into the Standard of Care.;J Law Med Ethics,2011