Canopy Development, Light Interception and Seed Production in Sunflower as Influenced by Temperature and Radiation

Abstract

Well watered mini-crops of sunflower were grown either in summer or winter in glasshouses maintained under five temperature regimes and a 16 h photoperiod. A field crop was grown concurrently with the summer glasshouse study. Summer radiation (25.5 MJ day-1) increased the size and/or number of many of the variables measured compared with winter radiation (9.5 MJ day-1). However, there was interaction between light and temperature upon phenological development, plant height, leaf number and harvest index. Seed production declined at temperatures above 18/13°C in summer and above 24/19°C in winter radiation, but fatty acid composition of the seed oil changed progressively with increasing temperature and was unaffected by radiation. Leaf area per plant increased faster under summer than winter radiation and in almost all temperature regimes reached considerably higher final values which resulted in a greater percentage of the incident radiation being intercepted. Temperature, though affecting the growth patterns and final areas of individual leaves in the canopies, did not alter the relationship between leaf area index and radiation interception. The light extinction coefficient changed with leaf area index and differed between summer and winter. Biomass per plant at maturity (B, g) was best related to radiation interception up to anthesis (I, MJ m-2), such that B = -234 + 541ogl, r2 = 0.91, but seed number (S) was correlated similarly with radiation interception and with the number of degree days (D) accumulated between floral initiation and anthesis (S = 1137+ 0.0051-0.762D, R2 = 0.90). Yield (Y, g per plant) was dependent on seed number, mean temperature (T) and radiation intercepted between anthesis and maturity, and the leaf area present at anthesis. However, over 97% of the variation in yield could be accounted for by the temperature and radiation factors in the manner Y = 39.07+0.047I- 1.26T. Harvest index and yield were not correlated for the cultivar examined.