Abstract
There is mounting evidence that the pre-medical emergency team (pre-MET) of rapid response systems is underutilised in clinical practice due to suboptimal structures and processes and resource constraints. In this perspective article, we argue for examining the pre-MET through a ‘Behaviour Change Wheel’ lens to improve the pre-MET and maximise the associated patient safety benefits. Using pre-MET communication practices as an example, we illustrate the value of the COM-B model, where clinicians’ ‘capability’, ‘opportunity’, and ‘motivation’ drive ‘behaviour’. Optimising clinicians’ behaviours and establishing failsafe rapid response systems is a complex undertaking; however, examining clinicians’ behaviours through the COM-B model enables reframing barriers and facilitators to develop multifaceted and coordinated solutions that are behaviourally and theoretically based. The COM-B model is recommended to clinical governance leaders and health services researchers to explore the underlying causes of behaviour and successfully enact change in the design, implementation, and use of the pre-MET to improve patient safety.
Reference22 articles.
1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National consensus statement: Essential elements for recognising and responding to acute physiological deterioration, 3rd edn. Sydney; 2021. Available at [verified 14 January 2024].
2. Use of the pre-medical emergency team tier of rapid response systems: A scoping review.;Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2021
3. Physiological antecedents and ward clinician responses before medical emergency team activation.;Crit Care Resusc,2017
4. Clinical review criteria and medical emergency teams: Evaluating a two-tier rapid response system.;Crit Care Resusc,2015
5. A newly designed observation and response chart’s effect upon adverse inpatient outcomes and rapid response team activity.;Intern Med J,2016