Affiliation:
1. Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Abstract
The rapid development of distance and blended learning formats poses a serious problem for instructors to objectively and reliably assess students’ knowledge. Modern learning management systems often do not provide comprehensive information about the quality of learning in a convenient form for the teacher. A brief review of the leading distance learning systems used in universities of the Russian Federation allows us to make sure of this. The capabilities of popular learning management systems, their advantages and disadvantages in processing information about students’ progress are analyzed. According to the results of the analysis, the necessity of further custom data processing becomes obvious.The methodology of evaluating the quality of students’ knowledge is shown in the example of an own development — the Abins.NET learning management system created at Perm National Research Polytechnic University. The necessity of using a minimum of two independent criteria for evaluating the quality of learning by conducting a correlation analysis between the grade, work time, and bonus points is confirmed.The comparison of bonus points accrual methods in own-developed learning management system, iSpring, and WebTutor was carried out and the conclusion was made about the necessity of automated bonus management (accrual, write-off) according to the criteria that are predetermined by the developer. The conclusions and suggestions on the selection of significant criteria and their calculation when working with any learning management system to assess the success of university students’ learning are formulated.
Publisher
Publishing House Education and Informatics
Reference23 articles.
1. Ertan K., Kocadere S. A. Gamification design to increase motivation in online learning environments: A systematic review. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age. 2022;7(2):151–159. DOI: 10.53850/joltida.1020044.
2. Govorov A. I., Govorova M. M., Valitova Yu. O. Assessment of relevance of developing methods for using gamification tools and gaming technology in the management systems of training. Computer Tools in Education Journal. 2018;(2):39–54. (In Russian.) EDN: VMZCPB.
3. Terbusheva E. A. Piotrowska X. R. Analytical potential of the LMS Moodle for monitoring the quality of personification. Society. Communication. Education. 2021;12(4):19–34. (In Russian.) EDN: WSSBWE. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.12402.
4. Lavrinenko I. Yu. Prospects for the LMS use in modern higher education. Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal “Koncept”. 2023;(1):17–35. (In Russian.) EDN: JBMUHS. DOI: 10.24412/2304-120X-2023-11002.
5. Florian B., Glahn C., Drachsler H., Specht M., Fabregat Gesa R. Activity-based learner-models for learner monitoring and recommendations in Moodle. Towards Ubiquitous Learning. EC-TEL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011;6964:111–124. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_10.