Knowledge control in informatics in military and civilian universities

Author:

Grigoriev N. F.1ORCID,Onishchuk S. A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Krasnodar Air Force Institute for Pilots named after Hero of the Soviet Union A. K. Serov

2. Kuban State University

Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of the results of learning control in higher military and civilian universities. The analysis and comparison of control methods of testing were used. It was found that even the simplest paper-based tests allow effective comparative assessment of knowledge and provide a much deeper differentiation of knowledge assessment than the five-point grading system.The cheapness and efficiency of the test used at Krasnodar Air Force Institute for Pilots are achieved by dividing it into three parts: a questionnaire, a response sheet, and a test stencil. The questionnaire is a reusable document, and the response sheet is small in size.The use of basic Microsoft Office programs in the test showed that the mastery of these programs among students is increasing year by year. It turned out that the mastery of these programs depends little on the main process of learning.When checking the knowledge in the field of computer science, the primary testing is basic. But in general, the control of residual knowledge with the help of testing can objectively establish the effectiveness of teaching any subject.The article conducted a mathematical analysis of the test results and plotted probability density plots, which were approximated by a smooth mathematical function. This clear view of the distribution of the indicator leads to an understanding of how well the knowledge is learned by students.

Publisher

Publishing House Education and Informatics

Subject

General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Arsenis P., Flores M., Petropoulou D. Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2022;47(2):245–258. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1897086

2. Mayorov A. N. Theory and practice of test creation for the education system: How to select, create, and use tests for educational purposes. Moscow, Public education; 2000. 351 p. (In Russian.)

3. Anastasi A. Psychological testing: in 2 volumes; foreword K. M. Gurevich, V. I. Dubovsky. Moscow, Pedagogy; 1982. 2 v. (In Russian.)

4. Bodrova T. Yu. Fundamentals of the methodology of pedagogical testing and its quality indicators. Pedagogy: Traditions and Innovations. Proc. II Int. Sci. Conf. Chelyabinsk, Dva Komsomol’tsa; 2012:194–199. (In Russian.) EDN: VMRHWZ

5. Biymursaeva B. M., Zhunusakunova A. D. The essence of the pedagogical test. Problems and Prospects for the Development of Education. Proc. II Int. Sci. Conf. Perm’, Merkuriy; 2012:1–3. (In Russian.) EDN: VMQVZJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3