Affiliation:
1. Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Astrakhan State Medical University” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
3. State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Moscow Region “Yegoryevskaya Central District Hospital”
Abstract
Highlights Valve replacements using mechanical prostheses are not inferior, and sometimes even advantageous to bioprostheses in terms of transvalvular hemodynamics and left ventricle reverse remodeling;During the average follow-up period, a significantly lower average pressure gradient and a higher effective opening area were recorded in the group undergoing neocuspidization with autologous pericardium compared to other types of implants;Despite the obvious hemodynamic advantages of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the midterm follow-up has revealed significant residual aortic regurgitation, which is highly undesirable. AbstractCurrently, there are not enough data on the comparative analysis of echocardiographic outcomes, especially in regards to the state of the left ventricle in the long term after different aortic valve interventions. In this review, we present up-to-date literature data (publications published over 20 years) concerning echocardiographic outcomes after different aortic valve replacements. For the search of publications, the authors used international databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Pubmed and Cochrane. The search keywords were: “aortic valve surgery”, “long-term period”, “echocardiographic outcomes”, “quality of life”. The analysis includes only comparative randomized, prospective or retrospective studies. A comparison between mechanical and biological prostheses has demonstrated that mechanical valves, in addition to displaying higher durability, can be advantageous in certain situations to bioprostheses in relation to transvalvular hemodynamics and reverse left ventricle remodeling. Regarding the comparison of stentless and stented bioprostheses with respect to peak transvalvular gradients and the effective orifice area, an obvious advantage was observed in the stentless bioprosthesis group. The majority of randomized clinical trials have showed great hemodynamic advantages of the Ross procedure in comparison with other types of aortic valve replacement, and an increase in the number of participants (due to future trials) may demonstrate even greater statistical significance. We have found only one publication that presents data on the comparison of the mid-term hemodynamic outcomes of neocuspidization of the aortic valve using autologous pericardium with other types of interventions. With an average follow-up period of 426±270 days, a significantly lower average pressure gradient and a higher effective orifice area were recorded in the neocuspidization group. Despite hemodynamic benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the mid-term period after surgery, the results of postoperative monitoring show significant residual aortic regurgitation, which is highly undesirable.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery
Reference64 articles.
1. Komarov R. N., Chernyavskii S. V., Ismailbaev A. M., Simonyan A. O. Autoperikardial'naya neokuspidizatsiya aortal'nogo klapana: kak eto delat'?. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2021;25(1):120-127. doi:10.21688/1681-3472-2021-1-120-127
2. Stocco F., Fabozzo A., Bagozzi L., Cavalli C., Tarzia V., D'Onofrio A., Lorenzoni G., Chiminazzo V., Gregori D., Gerosa G. Biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in non-elderly patients: a single-centre analysis of clinical outcomes and quality of life. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;32(4):515-521. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa306.
3. Okamoto Y., Yamamoto K., Yoshii S. Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement Using Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Analysis. J Card Surg. 2016; 31(4):195-202. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12719.
4. Rocha R., Cerqueira R., Saraiva F.A., Moreira S., Barros A.S., Almeida J., Amorim M.J., Lourenço A.P., Pinho P., Leite-Moreira A. Early And Midterm Outcomes Following Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valves In Patients Aged 50 To 70 Years. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2020; 27(3):179-189.
5. Weber A., Noureddine H., Englberger L., Dick F., Gahl B., Aymard T., Czerny M., Tevaearai H., Stalder M., Carrel T.P. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144(5):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.024