ASSESSMENT OF THE FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF STENOSIS IN MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE BASED ON INTEGRAL INSTANT FLOW RESERVE

Author:

Gromovoy Roman M.1ORCID,Pekarskiy Stanislav E.1ORCID,Baev Andrey E.1ORCID,Gergert Egor S.1ORCID,Tarasov Mikhail G.1ORCID,Sultanov Syrgak M.1ORCID,Bogdanov Yuri I.1ORCID,Suslov Ivan V.1ORCID,Gorokhovsky Alexey A.1ORCID,Falkovskaya Alla Y.1ORCID,Manukyan Musheg A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

HighlightsThe assessment of the anatomical significance of multivessel atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries – SYNTAX score takes into account the level and multiplicity of lesions by assigning higher scores for proximal stenoses and subsequent summation. Functional assessment of coronary blood flow – instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) uses one threshold value for all stenoses, and does not take into account their multiplicity. Aim. To develop a new indicator for the integral assessment of the functional significance of multivessel atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries, taking into account the level and multiplicity of lesions.Methods. The model for the integral assessment of the functional significance of a multivessel lesion was the sum of the transstenotic gradients (in our variant 1-iFR) of all stenoses >50%, weighted by the volume of the dependent LV myocardium, which was evaluated on the Duke jeopardy score: Σ(1-iFRi)*Nd, where Nd is the number of Duke dependent segmental arteries supplying blood to 1/6 of the myocardium. To bring the obtained values to the range 0–1 and the threshold level 0.89, the 1/(1+X) transformation was used, i.e. in the case of single non-proximal stenoses, the integral assessment index is equal to the value of the standard iFR. To test the ability of the indicator to take into account the level and multiplicity of lesions, we evaluated its relationship with SYNTAX in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (>2 segments with stenoses >50%), including in comparison with standard iFR (minimum value). The VERRATA PLUS conductor and the Core module of the Phillips Azurion angiographic system were used for iFR measurements.Results. The study included 42 patients, 29 men and 13 women, aged 65.3 ± 8.9 years, with multivessel coronary artery disease, SYNTAX score = 11.5 ± 2.7. The calculated values of integral iFR were expected to be less than the minimum standard iFR: 0.71 ± 0.11 versus 0.81 ± 0.14, respectively, p < 0,001. Integral iFR demonstrated significant inverse dependence on SYNTAX, p = 0,34, p < 0,05, whereas the standard iFR did not depend on SYNTAX. The number of patients with non-significant standard iFR, but significant integral iFR was 23.5% compared to patients with significant standard iFR. In accordance with the nature of the calculations, there were no cases of significant standard iFR and insignificant integral iFR.Conclusion. The obtained data demonstrated the possibility of taking into account the level and multiplicity of stenoses when assessing the functional significance of coronary artery lesions using the iFR method.

Publisher

NII KPSSZ

Reference13 articles.

1. Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., Siebert U., Ikeno F., van' t Veer M., Klauss V., Manoharan G., Engstrøm T., Oldroyd K.G., Ver Lee P.N., MacCarthy P.A., Fearon W.F.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.

2. Pijls N.H., Fearon W.F., Tonino P.A., Siebert U., Ikeno F., Bornschein B., van't Veer M., Klauss V., Manoharan G., Engstrøm T., Oldroyd K.G., Ver Lee P.N., MacCarthy P.A., De Bruyne B.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012.

3. Davies J.E., Sen S., Dehbi H.M., Al-Lamee R., Petraco R., Nijjer S.S., Bhindi R., Lehman S.J., Walters D., Sapontis J., Janssens L., Vrints C.J., Khashaba A., Laine M., Van Belle E., Krackhardt F., Bojara W., Going O., Härle T., Indolfi C., Niccoli G., Ribichini F., Tanaka N., Yokoi H., Takashima H., Kikuta Y., Erglis A., Vinhas H., Canas Silva P., Baptista S.B., Alghamdi A., Hellig F., Koo B.K., Nam C.W., Shin E.S., Doh J.H., Brugaletta S., Alegria-Barrero E., Meuwissen M., Piek J.J., van Royen N., Sezer M., Di Mario C., Gerber R.T., Malik I.S., Sharp A.S.P., Talwar S., Tang K., Samady H., Altman J., Seto A.H., Singh J., Jeremias A., Matsuo H., Kharbanda R.K., Patel M.R., Serruys P., Escaned J. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1824–1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445.

4. Götberg M., Christiansen E.H., Gudmundsdottir I.J., Sandhall L., Danielewicz M., Jakobsen L., Olsson S.E., Öhagen P., Olsson H., Omerovic E., Calais F., Lindroos P., Maeng M., Tödt T., Venetsanos D., James S.K., Kåregren A., Nilsson M., Carlsson J., Hauer D., Jensen J., Karlsson A.C., Panayi G., Erlinge D., Fröbert O.; iFR-SWEDEHEART. Investigators. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813–1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540.

5. Katritsis D.G., Ioannidis J.P. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Circulation 2005;111:2906–2912.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3