Elementary School Size and Differences in What Principals Emphasize and How They Train Their Teachers: A National Analysis

Author:

Azaiez Hafedh,Slate John R,Lunenburg Frederick C,Moore George W

Abstract

In this investigation, differences in what principals emphasized, in how they spent their work time, and how they trained their teachers were examined as a function of student enrollment numbers.  Data were acquired from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Class of 2010-2011 principal survey.  Three school categories were generated with student enrolment data: Small-size schools, Moderate-size schools, and Large-size schools.  Inferential statistical analyses revealed the presence of statistically significant differences in the way principals reporting spending their time and the training areas they emphasized.  Principals of Large-size schools spent more hours at work, invested more time working with teachers, and emphasized more training their teachers than principals of Small-size schools and Moderate-size schools.  Suggestions for future research and implications for policy and practice were made.

Publisher

Asian Research Association

Reference28 articles.

1. Texas Education Agency, (2016) Enrollment in Texas public schools, 2015-2016. Retrieved from: http://tea.texas.gov/acctres/enroll_2015-16.pdf

2. L.S. Kaplan, W.A. Owings, J. Nunnery, Principal quality: A Virginia study connecting Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards with student achievement, NASSP Bulletin, 89(2005) 28-44.

3. R.J. O'Donnell, G.P. White, Within the accountability era: Principals' instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement, NASSP Bulletin, 89(2005) 56-71.

4. J.J. Spillane, E.M. Camburn, A.S. Pareja, Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal's workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(2007) 103-125.

5. D. Borg, J.R. Slate, Principals’ leadership emphases as a function of school performance, Frontiers in Education, 2(2014) 1-5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3