Effects of Cooperative Learning Structures in Physical Education: A Systematic Review

Author:

C SchulzeORCID,M Von Huth

Abstract

One possibility of successfully dealing with the increasing heterogeneity of students is cooperative learning. However, this learning structure is still rarely used in physical education. To substantiate positive effects of cooperative learning in physical education and to support the commitment of pedagogical staff, the aim of this research was to evaluate physical, social, behavioral and psychological effects of interventions implementing cooperative learning structures in physical education lessons. The current systematic review was designed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were used to select articles that evaluated effects of cooperative learning in physical education of children and adolescents with an average age within the range of five to 19 years in August 2022. Studies had to report quantitative measured outcomes of cooperative learning. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility and assessed risk of bias. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate intervention effects. In total, 23 articles reporting 36 outcomes were included in the analysis with an overall sample size of 3699 children and adolescents aged between 6.5 and 17.5 years. Summarized 71% of all reported outcomes resulted in significant positive effects on cooperative learning compared to traditional teaching styles with most positive effects on social outcomes (92%). It is recommended to integrate different teaching styles, e.g. cooperative learning, to improve children’s development and to engage them in lifelong physical activity. Furthermore, interdisciplinary cooperation (e.g. between researchers and pedagogical school staff) should be sought in order to develop pedagogical approaches that consider the needs and prerequisites of students.

Publisher

Asian Research Association

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee, the committee of the regions, (2009) Draft 2010 joint report of the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the Education & Training 2010 work programme, Commission to the European communities, Brussels, Belgium.

2. J. Decristan, B. Fauth, M. Kunter, G. Büttner, E. Klieme, The interplay between class heterogeneity and teaching quality in primary school, International Journal of Educational Research, 86 (4) (2017) 109-121.

3. R.E. Slavin, (1995) Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, United States of America.

4. D.W. Johnson, R.T Johnson, Cooperative Learning: What Special Education Teachers Need to Know, The Pointer, 33 (2) (1989) 5-11.

5. A. Casey, V.A. Goodyear, Can cooperative learning achieve the four learning outcomes of physical education? A review of literature, Quest, 67 (1) (2015) 56-72.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3