Affiliation:
1. University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Serbia
Abstract
The article presents two theses. The first is that previous court judgments can be „sources“ of general rules and standards that will constraint the courts, as decision-makers, even if they are not formally established as legally binding. The second is that it should be so for several reasons – the most important being predictability and equality.
In this part of the article the concepts of separation of powers, types of state functions, and judicial power are explained. The reasons why the judicial power can perform the law-making function in a legal system in which it is not formally established are presented. As an illustration of how the system in which courts perform a law-making function works, the application of the doctrine of stare decisis in the USA is described. Finally, several decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia that indicate similar practice in Serbian legal system are analyzed.
Publisher
University of Belgrade Faculty of Law (Publications)
Reference60 articles.
1. Alexander, Lary, Emily Sherwin. 2001. The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
2. Alexander, Larry, Emily Sherwin. 2004. Judges as Rulemakers. University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper. Series 15.
3. Alexy, Robert, Ralf Dreier. 1991. Statutory interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany. 73–121. Interpreting statutes: A comparative study, eds. Neil MacCormick, Robert Summers. Aldershot: Ashgate – Dartmouth.
4. Barber, Nicholas. 1/2000. Sovereignty Re-examined: The Courts, Parliament, and Statutes. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20: 131–154.
5. Bayles, Michael D. 1992. Hart’s Legal Philosophy – an examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.