Abstract
This article enquires into the evolution of the European Commission’s discourse with respect to rule of law, corruption and media development in Serbia during period 2010–2021. The study performs a critical discourse analysis with use of discourse historical approach on the annual progress reports published by the European Commission. The study uncovers that the progress reports shows patterns of both continuity and change. The topics and subtopics related to rule of law, corruption and media represents large patterns of continuity. Some new topics, mostly negative ones, have arisen during the period, but the criteria and form of evaluation seems stable. The intensification strategy in the discourse the last four years seems not to be enough to transform the EU accession process, and it seems that Serbia lacks motivation on their road to accession.
Publisher
University of Belgrade Faculty of Law (Publications)
Reference64 articles.
1. Amoussou, Franck, Allagbe, Ayodele. 1/2018. Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature 6: 11-18.
2. ATLAS.ti. What is ATLAS.ti?. https://atlasti.com/product/what-is-atlas-ti/ (last visited 01.04.2022.)
3. Aydın-Düzgit, Senem. 3/2014. Critical discourse analysis in analysing European Union foreign policy: Prospects and challenges. Discourse Analysis and EU Foreign Policy: 354-367.
4. Bajic, Dragana, Wouter Zweers. 2020. The EU: defender of media freedom in Serbia?. Haag: Clingendael Institute.
5. Bechev, Dimitar. 2021. The Russian Challenge in Southeast Europe. 187-216 in European-Russian Power Relations in Turbulent Times, edited by Mai'a