Affiliation:
1. University of Victoria
2. Center for the Study of Complexity, Creation, and Change
3. University of London
4. Oklahoma State University
Abstract
This article develops a typology for making sense of the numerous strands of Austrian (and Austrian-related) economics and demonstrates how this typology can guide organizational entrepreneurship scholars wishing to ground their research in Austrian thought. In the process, not only are existing insights from the history of Austrian economic thought rediscovered, but clearer light is also shed on important perspectives from that tradition that have received less attention in entrepreneurship research. Based on the Austrian concept of entrepreneurial production and its relationship with the core concepts of knowledge and change, the typology yields four perspectives—equilibration, punctuated equilibrium, disequilibration, and punctuated disequilibrium. These perspectives’ different paradigms as used in organizational research are explored, along with their ontological, epistemological, and methodological assumptions. The typology is illustrated with selected empirical examples from organizational research to spotlight the types of questions that contemporary scholars may appropriately ask and answer from each perspective.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference103 articles.
1. Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. 2d ed. London: Sage Publications.
2. Anderson, Philip, and Michael L. Tushman. 1990. “Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35, no. 4: 604–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393511.
3. Asaba, Shigeru, and Marvin B. Lieberman. 1999. “Why Do Firms Behave Similarly? A Study on New Product Introductions in the Japanese Soft-Drink Industry.” Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.1999.27594817.
4. Barbieri, Fabio. 2017. “Lachmann’s Transformation.” Paper presented at The Legacy of Ludwig Lachmann: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Institutions, Agency and Uncertainty Conference, Johannesburg, South Africa.
5. Batstone, Stephen, and John Pheby. 1996. “Entrepreneurship and Decision Making: The Contribution of G.L.S. Shackle.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research 2, no. 2: 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552559610119322.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献