Abstract
Sound money should have at its base a group of non-interest-bearing assets which have the quality of such extreme moneyness and are in such restricted supply that individuals in aggregate are willing to hold (directly or indirectly) large amounts even when other monetary assets outside the monetary base yield substantial interest income. These conditions were fulfilled historically under the pre–First World War international gold standard. They should hold also for the hypothetical creation in the present or future of sound money, whether fiat or gold. By contrast, under the actual monetary regime, with its banner standard target of 2 percent inflation, the monetary base has become severely corrupted: extreme moneyness has eroded, and individuals derive no utility from it at the margin of holdings. The nature of the route from here to there—from a corrupted monetary base to one suitable for sound money—is the final subject of the present article.
Reference26 articles.
1. Bernanke, Ben S. 2009. “The Crisis and the Policy Response.” Stamp Lecture, London School of Economics, London, England, January 13, 2009. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090113a.htm.
2. Bernanke, Ben S., Thomas Laubach, Frederic S. Mishkin, and Adam S. Posen. 2001. Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
3. Brown, Brendan. 2018. The Case against 2 Per Cent Inflation: From Negative Interest Rates to a 21st Century Gold Standard. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
4. Brown, Brendan, and Philippe Simonnot. Forthcoming. Bad Money in Pandemic, War, and Recession. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Brown, Brendan, and Robert Pringle. 2022. A Guide to Good Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.