Affiliation:
1. Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State University
Abstract
The article analyses the gradual development of the narrative and the change in its main features. Initially, the narrative was considered as an authentic reproduction of past experience that is meaningful for the narrator. Later, the definition and study of such attributes of the narrative as sequence, plot, the narrator’s value attitude, and time began. Contemporary research focuses on temporality, causality, the context of narrative formation, certainty (uncertainty) of narrative scenarios, and narrative control. There has been a shift away from viewing the narrative as a finished product towards understanding it as a process of meaning-making from the narrator’s present. Narrative formation is rooted in social or personally meaningful context.
Publisher
Novosibirsk State University (NSU)
Reference12 articles.
1. Barbashina E. V. Problemy medicinskogo narrativa // Idei i Idealy. 2020. Vol. 12. № 3 (1). P. 152–163. (in Russian)
2. Chase S. E. Narrative Inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices // Handbook of qualitative research / Ed. by N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Th ousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2005. P. 651–679.
3. Franzosi R. Narrative analysis – Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative // Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. № 24. P. 517–554.
4. Labov W. , Waletzky J. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience // Journal of Narrative and Life History. 1997. № 7. P. 3–38.
5. Lekhcier V. L. Narrativnaya medicina: svetlaya utopiya doktora Rity SHeron? // Obshchestvo remissii: na puti k narrativnoj medicine / Pod red. V.L. Lekhciera. Samara: Izd-vo Samar. gos. un-ta. 2012. P. 110–123. (in Russian)