La sociedad contra las élites: aproximación a las bases sociales del apoyo electoral a Petro en Colombia

Author:

Kessler GabrielORCID,Vommaro GabrielORCID,Rodríguez-Raga Juan CarlosORCID,Calderón Herrera Juan Andrés

Abstract

Objective/Context: One of the effects of the internal war in Colombia was to hinder the expression of the social conflict and of the organizations that mobilize the popular sectors. The plebiscite to ratify the Peace Accord aimed at putting an end to the war was a politically polarized juncture channeled through the electoral process. The shift in the centrality of the issue of the internal war after the signing of the Accord opened the possibility of expression of the social conflict. However, in a country with weak social and political organizations to shape this conflict, it is expressed: 1) without politically aligned framings; 2) as a generalized discontent with the elites and a feeling of “tilted playing field”. Therefore, political polarization after the plebiscite is low. We develop this argument based on the analysis of voters’ positions in relation to the most important issues of the political agenda: Peace Agreement, redistributive agenda (taxes and welfare) and governmental management of the COVID pandemic, and gender agenda. Methodology: The article is based on 16 focus groups conducted between September and November 2021 in three regions of Colombia —Bogotá, Antioquia and the Caribbean— in which voters from the two main 2018 electoral options participated, with gender balance and variation in occupation and between middle and lower classes. Conclusion: The data show that there is no political polarization at the citizen level. Instead, a high level of discontent towards political and economic elites is observed, which may be at the basis of electoral support for Petro in 2022. Originality: The article offers an alternative look at the perception that many Colombians have that they live in a polarized society and contributes to the understanding of electoral support for an “anti-system” force in the 2022 election.

Publisher

Universidad de los Andes

Reference49 articles.

1. Abracinskas, Lilian y Alejandra López Gómez, coords. 2007. Aborto en debate. Dilemas y desafíos del Uruguay democrático. Montevideo: MYSU. http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/558

2. Abramowitz, Alan y Kyle Saunders. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?”. The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493

3. Aguirre, Javier, Ana Pabón y Paul Cáceres. 2018. “Argumentos religiosos y matrimonio igualitario: análisis de las discusiones en el Congreso de la República de Colombia, a la luz de la propuesta de Habermas sobre la religión en la esfera pública”. Reflexión Política 20 (39): 201-219. https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.3303

4. Amador, Diego. 2017. “De polarización, teflón y referendos: sesgo de confirmación y tribalismos en la política”. La Silla Vacía, 9 de octubre. https://www.lasillavacia.com/la-silla-vacia/opinion/articulos-columna/de-polarizaci%C3%B3n,-tefl%C3%B3n-y-referendos-sesgo-de-confirmaci%C3%B3n-y-tribalismos-en-la-pol%C3%ADtica/

5. Archenti, Nélida. 2018. “Focus group como forma de entrevista grupal”. En Manual de metodología de las ciencias sociales, editado por Alberto Marrandi, Nélida Archenti y Juan Piovani, 279-290. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. THE IDEOLOGY OF BOLSONARO VOTERS;Sociologia & Antropologia;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3