36. Aspect-seeing in animal research: the absence of justice in the harm-benefit analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

36. Aspect-seeing in animal research: the absence of justice in the harm-benefit analysis

Published:2022-09-01 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Transforming food systems: ethics, innovation and responsibility
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Linder E.¹²,Grimm H.¹²

Affiliation:

1. University of Vienna, Department of Philosophy, Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy, Universitätsstraβe 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.

2. Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Link

https://www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/pdf/10.3920/978-90-8686-939-8_36

Reference14 articles.

1. Agam-Segal, R. (2014). When language gives out: conceptualization, and aspect-seeing as a form of judgement. Metaphilosophy 1, 2014: 41-68.

2. Agam-Segal, R. (2015). Aspect-perception as a philosophical method. Nordic Wittgenstein Review. 4 (1), 2015: 93-121. Dresser, R. (2019) Putting the ethical principles in practice. In Beauchamp, T. L. and DeGrazia, D. Principles of animal research ethics., Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.

3. The Realistic Spirit

4. Dresser, R. (1989) Developing standards in animal research. Review Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 194: 1184-1191.

5. Dostoyevsky, F. (2003) The brothers Karamazov. Penguin, London, United Kingdom.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Animal research ethics as interaction of research ethics, animal ethics, and (animal protection) law;ALTEX;2023