Diversity of pig production systems at farm level in Europe

Author:

Bonneau Michel12,Antoine-Ilari Estelle3,Phatsara Chirawath45,Brinkmann Detert4,Hviid Marchen6,Christiansen Michael Groes7,Fàbrega Emma8,Rodríguez Pedro8,Rydhmer Lotta9,Enting Ina1011,de Greef Karel10,Edge Helen12,Dourmad Jean-Yves12,Edwards Sandra12

Affiliation:

1. INRA, UMR1079 SENAH, 35590 Saint Gilles, France

2. Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1079 SENAH, Laboratoire SPA, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, CS 84215, 35042 Rennes cedex, France

3. French Pork and Pig Institute, IFIP, 34 Boulevard de la Gare, 31500 Toulouse, France

4. Institute for Animal Science, Universität Bonn, Katzenburgweg 7-9, 53115 Bonn, Germany

5. Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, 50200 Chiang Mai, Thailand

6. Danish Meat Research Institute, Maglegårdsvej 2, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark

7. Danish Agriculture and Food Council, Danish Pig Production, Axeltorv 3, 1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark

8. IRTA-Monells, Veïnat de Sies, s/n 17121, Monells, Spain

9. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden

10. Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, the Netherlands

11. Wan Dai Ying, Ltd, 16F Zhongyu Plaza, A6 Gongti Bei Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, P.R.

12. University of Newcastle, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to perform an inventory of pig production systems, at farm level. The main aim was to document the variety of existing production systems in European countries. Information was collected from available sources, mostly national experts and literature, regarding target markets and information management, apparent degree of intensification, technical and economic performance, environmental impact and animal welfare. Eighty-four production systems were identified in 23 countries, of which 40 were reported as conventional and the remaining 44 were reported as differentiated. The differentiated and conventional production systems differ significantly in many respects; however, high variability was also found within each category as well as a large overlap between the two categories with respect to the distribution of most variables. Most differentiated systems claim to have superior characteristics in at least one dimension of sustainability. The specificities of these claims were analysed and multiple correspondence analysis of the data again showed considerable overlap between conventional and differentiated systems. Hierarchical clustering analysis resulted in three clusters. Systems in Cluster A (mostly conventional) have the characteristics of intensive production oriented towards standard quality. Systems in Cluster C (all differentiated) are just the opposite with numerous characteristics indicative of more extensive and more welfare- and quality-oriented production. Systems in Cluster B (made up of almost equal numbers of conventional and differentiated systems) fall between these two extremes; they are particularly common in Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Management Information Systems

Reference16 articles.

1. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France

2. Conventional versus alternative pig production assessed by multicriteria decision analysis

3. Product quality attributes associated with outdoor pig production

4. Edwards, S.A., J-Y. Dourmad, H.L. Edge, E. Fabrega, K. De Greef, E. Ilari, C. Phatsara, L. Rydhmer and M. Bonneau 2008. Q-porkchains: tools for assessing sustainability of pigmeat production systems. Proc 59th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Vilnius, Lithuania.

5. European Commission, 2006. Special Eurobarometer 238. Risk Issues. February. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/resources/special-eurobarometer_riskissues20060206_en.pdf

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3