Evaluating alternate strategic options for agricultural value chains

Author:

Archer A. Ainsley1,Thorburn Peter1,Hobson Phil2,Higgins Andrew1

Affiliation:

1. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Level 3, Queensland BioScience Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia

2. Sugar Research and Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, P.O. Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4002, Australia

Abstract

Making strategic innovations to agricultural value chains can be difficult. Complex biophysical and logistical interactions make a priori estimates of chain-wide impacts difficult. This paper gives the results of applying an agent-based, value chain modelling framework, developed and applied in participation with stakeholders in three sugar mill case studies, which evaluated the viability of maximising the co-generation of electricity by harvesting the whole crop (i.e. cane leaves as well as stalk). The existing practice of harvesting predominantly cane stalk (as in the 2003 production year) was the base case for comparing a scenario where electricity co-generation (from crop residues) was an added revenue stream. Increased revenues were compared to costs within sectors as per changes in biophysical flows for the grower, harvesting, transport and milling segments in the chain. In general, predicted impacts on the farming and milling sectors were greater than anticipated by stakeholders, while the impacts on the harvesting and transport sectors were less than anticipated because of increased logistical efficiency possible in the sectors. A virtual experience of their supply chain facilitated more complete knowledge transfer about possible impacts of whole-crop harvesting to managers across the chain and thus increased their capacity to evaluate innovative business models involving the co-generation of electricity.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Management Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Archer, A.A., A.J. Higgins and P.J. Thorburn, 2009. A method for comprehending and adapting complex supply chains in agriculture. Journal on Chain and Network Science, in press.

2. Systems thinking and practices in the education of agriculturalists

3. Structural Changes in the Agricultural Industries: How Do We Measure, Analyze and Understand Them?

4. Agriculture in the 21st Century

5. Boehlje, M., L. Schrader and J. Akridge, 1998. Observations on the Formation of Chains. In: G.W. Ziggers, J.H. Trienekens and P.J.P. Zuurbier, (Eds.), Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Chain Management in Agribusiness and the Food Industry. Wageningen Agricultural Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 393-404.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3