Affiliation:
1. GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
The initial risk assessment, especially when using a risk score system, is the main step in a risk assessment process that comes after determining the scope of the risks and assessment. The Fine-Kinney method, a thorough approach to quantitative assessments to help keep risks under control, is commonly used in risk assessment. A risk score (RS) is determined using the standard version of Fine-Kinney by mathematically multiplication of probability (P), exposure (E), and consequence (C) parameters. The Fine-Kinney-based risk evaluation approach has the disadvantage of not accounting for the relationships among the risk parameters' interaction and determining the risk precedence of work-related hazards. Hence, a new hazard evaluation method for occupational health and safety (OHS) is required to lessen the adverse effects of rising dangers. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed for integrating Fine–Kinney-based occupational hazard evaluation and AHP-COPRAS for the energy distribution and investment sector under the Pythagorean fuzzy environment. A lifting equipment case study is used to demonstrate practicality and efficacy of the suggested integrated approach. To verify the novel method to risk assessment, a comparative study and sensitivity analysis are also provided. As a result, using the benefit of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, which more effectively express uncertainty, the integrated approach yields more logical conclusions for assessing work-related hazards in the energy distribution and investment sector.
Publisher
Gazi University Journal of Science
Subject
Multidisciplinary,General Engineering
Reference40 articles.
1. [1] Ceylan, H., “Türkiye’deki Elektrik Üretim, İletim ve Dağıtım Tesislerinde Meydana Gelen İş Kazalarının Analizi”, Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, 4 (2): 30–42, (2012).
2. [2] Aslan, İ., & Çelik, Y., “Elektrik Dağıtım Sektöründe Çalışanların İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği İncelemesi: Muş, Bitlis ve Van İlleri Uygulaması”, Çalışma İlişkileri Dergisi, 1: 130–145, (2022).
3. [3] Yönetmelik, “Resmî Gazete” 28512. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/12/20121229-13.htm, (2012, December 29)
4. [4] Oz, N. E., Mete, S., Serin, F., & Gul, M., “Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards”, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25(6): 1615-1632, (2019).
5. [5] Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M., “Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment”, Safety science, 102: 290-300, (2018).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献