Affiliation:
1. Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA;
2. Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;,
Abstract
Does democracy matter for normatively desirable outcomes? We survey results from 1,100 cross-country analyses drawn from 600 journal articles published after the year 2000. These analyses are conducted on 30 distinct outcomes pertaining to social policy, economic policy, citizenship and human rights, military and criminal justice, and overall governance. Across these diverse outcomes, most studies report either a positive or null relationship with democracy. However, there is evidence of threshold bias, suggesting that reported findings may reflect a somewhat exaggerated image of democracy's effects. Additionally, democratic effects are more likely to be found for outcomes that are easily attained than for those that lie beyond the reach of government but are often of great normative importance. We also find that outcomes measured by subjective indicators show a stronger positive relationship with democracy than outcomes that are measured or proxied by more objective indicators.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Democracy and ethnic inequality: a comparative case study;Democratization;2024-08-07
2. Sources of data;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02
3. List of Tables;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02
4. List of Figures;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02
5. Regression tables;The Universal Republic;2024-07-02