Food Loss and Waste: Measurement, Drivers, and Solutions

Author:

Spang Edward S.1,Moreno Laura C.2,Pace Sara A.1,Achmon Yigal34,Donis-Gonzalez Irwin5,Gosliner Wendi A.6,Jablonski-Sheffield Madison P.7,Momin Md Abdul5,Quested Tom E.8,Winans Kiara S.9,Tomich Thomas P.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;,

2. Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;

3. Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;

4. Program of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, Guangdong Province 515063, China;

5. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;,

6. Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, California 94607, USA;

7. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;

8. The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), Banbury, Oxon OX16 5BH, United Kingdom;

9. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;

10. Agricultural Sustainability Institute, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA;

Abstract

It has been estimated that one-third of global food is lost or wasted, entailing significant environmental, economic, and social costs. The scale and impact of food loss and waste (FLW) has attracted significant interest across sectors, leading to a relatively recent proliferation of publications. This article synthesizes existing knowledge in the literature with a focus on FLW measurement, drivers, and solutions. We apply the widely adopted DPSIR (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) framework to structure the review. Key takeaways include the following: Existing definitions of FLW are inconsistent and incomplete, significant data gaps remain (by food type, stage of supply chain, and region, especially for developing countries), FLW solutions focus more on proximate causes rather than larger systemic drivers, and effective responses to FLW will require complementary approaches and robust evaluation.

Publisher

Annual Reviews

Subject

General Environmental Science

Cited by 103 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3