Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade

Author:

Grubb Michael1,Jordan Nino David1,Hertwich Edgar2,Neuhoff Karsten3,Das Kasturi4,Bandyopadhyay Kaushik Ranjan5,van Asselt Harro67,Sato Misato8,Wang Ranran9,Pizer William A.10,Oh Hyungna11

Affiliation:

1. UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, United Kingdom;

2. Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen, Norway

3. Climate Policy Department, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Berlin, Germany

4. Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, Delhi NCR, India

5. Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

6. University of Eastern Finland Law School, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland

7. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

8. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom

9. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

10. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA

11. Kyung Hee University, Gyeonggi, South Korea

Abstract

We review the state of knowledge concerning international CO2 emission transfers associated particularly with trade in energy-intensive goods and concerns about carbon leakage arising from climate policies. The historical increase in aggregate emission transfers from developing to developed countries peaked around 2006 and declined since. Studies find no evidence that climate policies lead to carbon leakage, but this is partly due to shielding of key industrial sectors, which is incompatible with deep decarbonization. Alternative or complementary consumption-based approaches areneeded. Private sector initiatives to trace and address carbon emissions throughout supply chains have grown substantially but cannot compensate for inadequate policy. Three main price-based approaches to tackling carbon leakage are potentially compatible with international trade rules: border adjustments on imports, carbon consumption charges, and climate excise contributions combined with emissions trading. We also consider standards and public procurement options to tackle embodied emissions. Finally, we discuss proposals for carbon clubs involving cooperation among a limited set of countries.

Publisher

Annual Reviews

Subject

General Environmental Science

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3