Affiliation:
1. Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287;
Abstract
Scholars studying interactions among multiple communities have often used the term legal pluralism to describe the inevitable intermingling of normative systems that results from these interactions. In recent years, a new application of pluralist insights has emerged in the international and transnational realm. This review aims to survey and help define this emerging field of global legal pluralism. I begin by briefly describing sites for pluralism research, both old and new. Then I discuss how pluralism has come to be seen as an attractive analytical framework for those interested in studying law on the world stage. Finally, I identify advantages of a pluralist approach and respond to criticisms, and I suggest ways in which pluralism can help both in reframing old conceptual debates and in generating useful normative insights for designing procedural mechanisms, institutions, and discursive practices for managing hybrid legal/cultural spaces.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion;Negotiating Legality;2024-06-27
2. The Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of Sustainable Development;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
3. Mise en Scène;Sustainable Development, International Law, and a Turn to African Legal Cosmologies;2024-05-23
4. Cultural expertise in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland: the potential for Nordic Legal Pluralism;Legal Pluralism and Critical Social Analysis;2024-05-03
5. Authoritarianism and legality;Asia Pacific Law Review;2024-03-22