Sociological Perspectives on Medical Ethics and Decision-Making

Author:

Zussman Robert1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, State University of New York—Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794

Abstract

Sociologists have not addressed directly the normative issues that constitute the core of medical ethics as an intellectual discipline. They have, however, contributed to a “realist” critique of medical ethics in practice. In regard to the institutionalization of “autonomy” around the principle of informed consent, they have noted widespread indifference on the part of patients, considerable variation among settings, and a persistent ability of physicians to deflect challenges to their authority. In regard to failed efforts to institutionalize “justice,” sociologists have noted both the difficulty physicians experience moving from individual clinical decisions to a recognition of the collective consequences of those decisions and the social structures that shape allocation decisions along dimensions orthogonal to ethical concerns. Most importantly, however, medical ethics is an arena in which sociologists can revisit, in new form, old issues about the doctor-patient relationship, the relationship between medicine and gender, the meaning of death and dying, and the character of medical professionalism.

Publisher

Annual Reviews

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. New horizons in the sociology of sport;Frontiers in Sports and Active Living;2023-02-10

2. “Why didn't we do it”? Reproductive loss and the problem of post-mortem consent;Social Science & Medicine;2021-05

3. More scientific, more ethical: The ADHD controversy and boundary‐work in Taiwan;Sociology of Health & Illness;2021-05

4. A Macroergonomic Study of Hospice and Life-Prolonging Treatment in the UK;Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care;2020-09

5. Negotiating the ‘buffet’ of choice: advances in technology and end‐of‐life decision‐making in the intensive care unit setting;Sociology of Health & Illness;2020-03-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3