Affiliation:
1. Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138;
2. Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8209;
Abstract
This article reviews the observational, laboratory, and field experimental literatures on interventions for reducing prejudice. Our review places special emphasis on assessing the methodological rigor of existing research, calling attention to problems of design and measurement that threaten both internal and external validity. Of the hundreds of studies we examine, a small fraction speak convincingly to the questions of whether, why, and under what conditions a given type of intervention works. We conclude that the causal effects of many widespread prejudice-reduction interventions, such as workplace diversity training and media campaigns, remain unknown. Although some intergroup contact and cooperation interventions appear promising, a much more rigorous and broad-ranging empirical assessment of prejudice-reduction strategies is needed to determine what works.
Cited by
860 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Appendix;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
2. Women’s Inclusion and Political Violence;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
3. Solving the Concept Stretching Problem;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
4. Notes;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13
5. Conclusion;Positioning Women in Conflict Studies;2024-09-13