Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1472;
Abstract
This essay synthesizes the results of the large number of studies of late–20th-century democratization published during the last 20 years. Strong evidence supports the claims that democracy is more likely in more developed countries and that regime transitions of all kinds are more likely during economic downturns. Very few of the other arguments advanced in the transitions literature, however, appear to be generally true. This study proposes a theoretical model, rooted in characteristics of different types of authoritarian regimes, to explain many of the differences in democratization experience across cases in different regions. Evidence drawn from a data set that includes 163 authoritarian regimes offers preliminary support for the model proposed.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
1277 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Co-Evolution and Spatial Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
2. More Measurement Issues for Diffusion, Zones of Peace, and Network Effects;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
3. Zones of Peace and Neighborhood Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
4. A Dyadic Perspective;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
5. Measurement Issues;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02