Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs

Author:

Vela Monica B.1,Erondu Amarachi I.2,Smith Nichole A.3,Peek Monica E.4,Woodruff James N.5,Chin Marshall H.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Section of Academic Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine in Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA;

2. Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

4. Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine and Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

5. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

6. Department of Medicine and Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Abstract

Health care providers hold negative explicit and implicit biases against marginalized groups of people such as racial and ethnic minoritized populations. These biases permeate the health care system and affect patients via patient–clinician communication, clinical decision making, and institutionalized practices. Addressing bias remains a fundamental professional responsibility of those accountable for the health and wellness of our populations. Current interventions include instruction on the existence and harmful role of bias in perpetuating health disparities, as well as skills training for the management of bias. These interventions can raise awareness of provider bias and engage health care providers in establishing egalitarian goals for care delivery, but these changes are not sustained, and the interventions have not demonstrated change in behavior in the clinical or learning environment. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these interventions may be hampered by health care providers’ work and learning environments, which are rife with discriminatory practices that sustain the very biases US health care professions are seeking to diminish. We offer a conceptual model demonstrating that provider-level implicit bias interventions should be accompanied by interventions that systemically change structures inside and outside the health care system if the country is to succeed in influencing biases and reducing health inequities.

Publisher

Annual Reviews

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Cited by 112 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effectiveness of the uChicago Health Inequity Classification System on surgical morbidity and mortality conference: A pilot study;The American Journal of Surgery;2024-10

2. Ending Unequal Treatment and Achieving Optimal Health for All;JAMA;2024-09-09

3. Addressing Bias in the Occupational Therapy Admissions Process;Occupational Therapy In Health Care;2024-09-03

4. Understanding Implicit Bias and Its Impact in Veterinary Medicine;Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice;2024-09

5. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion;Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3