Abstract
The article addresses the issue of differences in the translation of the term ambidexterity, which is equated in the Polish literature with such terms as ambidextrousness, two-handedness, double-agility, ambivalence, or duality. The choice of the Polish term is of significance for intuitive understanding of this phenomenon by both researchers and non-specialists, including practitioners. The main objective is to systematize the terminological issues and thus propose a Polish translation of the term ambidexterity, in the discipline of management and quality sciences, in the sub-discipline of process management. Methods such as bibliometric analysis and a review of the Polish literature on the subject, using the Publish or Perish database, were used to achieve the main objective. The results of the study and the conclusions formulated contribute to the current knowledge regarding the discussion on the Polish equivalent of the term ambidexterity. In the Authors' opinion, the concept most fully and accurately reflecting the context of the contradiction between exploitative and exploratory activities in process management, within the sphere of the discussed BPM issues, is duality. The article is original in nature because, even if partially, it fills the cognitive gap concerning the sparsity of publications addressing the integrative view of ambidexterity and BPM.
Publisher
Szkoła Główna Handlowa GV
Reference40 articles.
1. Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B. i Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
2. Ahmad, T. i Van Looy, A. (2020). Business process management and digital innovations: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(17), 6827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176827
3. Andriopoulos, C. i Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
4. Argyris, C. i Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
5. Bitkowska, A. (2019). Od klasycznego do zintegrowanego zarządzania procesowego w organizacjach. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献