Business Process Management education in Poland: A manifesto for academic teaching
Author:
, Sliż PiotrORCID, Berniak-Woźny JustynaORCID, , Brzychczy EdytaORCID, , Gabryelczyk RenataORCID, , Gdowska KatarzynaORCID, , Grzesiak MarzenaORCID, , Napieraj AnetaORCID, , Podobińska-Staniec MartaORCID, , Potoczek Natalia R.ORCID, , Szelągowski MarekORCID, , Senkus PiotrORCID, , Kluza KrzysztofORCID,
Abstract
This paper critically assesses Business Process Management (BPM) education in Poland and provides evidence-based recommendations for improvement. Through a survey of 44 BPM educators, the study evaluates BPM lifecycle coverage, IT tool utilization, and incorporation of the Six Core Elements of BPM. The findings reveal a focus on process modeling and analysis, identifying gaps in the way the entire BPM lifecycle is addressed. Despite the utilization of various IT tools, there is a notable absence of coverage for emerging topics such as process mining, AI, and Robotic Process Automation. Only 12% of courses cover all Six Core Elements of BPM, and there is a critical gap in student education, which is the underrepresentation of the People and Culture elements. The paper concludes with a manifesto for greater alignment between academic education and industry needs through comprehensive BPM curricula, dedicated software tools, and more robust coverage of the strategic and governance aspects of BPM. This will bridge the gap between academic education and real-world BPM applications, so that graduates can be better prepared for the challenges of the modern business landscape, which can enhance the quality and effectiveness of BPM education, thereby aligning it with the evolving demands of the business environment and contributing to the growth and competitiveness of organizations in Poland.
Publisher
Szkoła Główna Handlowa GV
Reference23 articles.
1. Antonucci, Y., Fortune, A., & Kirchmer, M. (2020). An examination of associations between business process management capabilities and the benefits of digitalization: all capabilities are not equal. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-02-2020-0079 2. de Bruin, T., & Rosemann, M. (2007). Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. ACIS 2007 Proceedings, 42. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2007/42 3. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2nd ed.). Springer. 4. Evans, N., Kaur, K., & Fernando, A. (2023). Developing Industry-Ready Business Analysts: Guiding Principles for Effective Assessment for Learning (AfL) in a BPM Course. In: J. Köpke, O. López-Pintado, R. Plattfaut, J.-R. Rehse, K., Gdowska, F. Gonzalez-Lopez, J. Munoz-Gama, K. Smit, & J. M. E. M. van der Werf (Eds.), Business Process Management: Blockchain, Robotic Process Automation and Educators Forum (pp. 230-239). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43433-4_16 5. Gabryelczyk, R., & Jurczuk, A. (2015). The diagnosis of information potential of selected business process modelling notations. Information Systems in Management, 4(1), 26-38.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|