EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICE AS A SOURCE OF LAW

Author:

Kaliuzhna Yevheniia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Odesa State University of Internal Affairs

Abstract

The urgency of the research is stipulated by the necessity to study the European Court of Human Rights practice as a source of law at the regional level, which affects the development of national legal systems. The purpose of the article is to elucidate the European Court of Human Rights practice as a source of law for member states to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (on the examples of individual decisions). The research is based on the understanding of law as a dynamic social and cultural phenomenon having a specific content and is closely related to human dignity, human rights and justice. Legislation is only one form of law that can exist outside the prescriptive texts, which requires the use of the hermeneutic method and content analysis of the European Court of Human Rights decisions. The article finds out that the European Court of Human Rights is one of the most effective institutions for human rights implementation. Applying the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which was adopted in 1950, through a dynamic interpretation, the European Court of Human Rights ensures the effectiveness and efficiency of this international treaty, revealing the content in the aspect of modernity. States parties to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are obliged to comply with the European Court of Human Rights decisions, which (the court) always follows its practice, ensuring legal certainty and the rule of law. This allows considering the European Court of Human Rights a subject forming legal doctrines at both regional and national levels. The materials of the article can be used for scientific research of the European Court of Human Rights practice as a source of law at the regional level, which affects national legal systems. The main provisions of the article can be used to justify the study of ECHR practice by lawyers as well as law students and civil servants.

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference28 articles.

1. Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950).

2. European Court of Human Rights. (1978). Case of Ireland v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 5310/71). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECHR,3ae6b7004.html

3. European Court of Human Rights. (1989). Case of Soering v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 14038/88), Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57619

4. European Court of Human Rights. (1998). Case of A. v. the United Kingdom (Application no. 100/1997/884/1096). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-58232

5. European Court of Human Rights. (2000). Case of Sanles Sanles v. Spain (Application no. 48335/99). Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-22151

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3