Prospects for Encouraging Competition in the Public Social Services Market

Author:

Zolotareva A. B.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RANEPA

Abstract

The article examines the practice of engaging private providers to deliver public social services in Russia, as well as the legal regulation applicable to those activities. In addition, it outlines the evolution of the legislation and incentives affecting the access of private providers to the public services market, what their actual share in this market is, and the benefits and risks from expanding it. The author’s overall conclusion is that involving private providers to deliver public services is advisable, but it should not be an end in itself. The consequences of this policy for the state budget, public infrastructure, and consumers should be considered. In keeping with this recommendation, the author suggests legislative amendments designed to eliminate artificial incentives for expanding the share of private providers in the public services market while maintaining state control over the volume of financing of the public infrastructure in order to prevent its degradation. The article also analyzes the Russian system for independent assessment of the quality of public services (IQA) which began in 2015 and assesses its suitability for comparing the quality of services from public and private providers. The author finds shortcomings in the IQA methodology, which artificially inflate the overall level of assessments. This becomes a disincentive for providers to improve the quality of their services and also reduces public confidence in the results of IQA. This analysis of IQA is used to generate proposals for improving its methodology by making its results more objective.

Publisher

Economic Policy

Reference14 articles.

1. Batkibekov S., Besstremyannaya G., Bolshakova E., Zolotareva A., Shishkin S. Otraslevye, sektoral’nye i regional’nye osobennosti reformy byudzhetnykh uchrezhdeniy v Rossii [Industrial, Sectoral, and Regional Features of the Reform of Budgetary Institutions in Russia]. Moscow, IEPP, 2005. (In Russ.)

2. Batkibekov S., Dezhina I., Zolotareva A., Rozhdestvenskaya I., Kuzyk M., Malginov G., Radygin A., Sinelnikov-Murylev S., Simachev Yu. Povyshenie effektivnosti byudzhetnogo finansirovaniya gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdeniy i upravleniya gosudarstvennymi unitarnymi predpriyatiyami [Increasing the Efficiency of Budget Financing of Government Institutions and Management of State Unitary Enterprises]. Moscow, IEPP, 2003. (In Russ.)

3. Zolotareva A. B. Riski perekhoda k rynochnomu razmeshcheniyu gosudarstvennogo zakaza na okazanie sotsial’nykh uslug [Risks of Transitioning to Market Placement of State Orders for the Provision of Social Services]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya [Legal Studies], 2018, no. 2, pp. 17-26. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2018.2.21562. (In Russ.)

4. Klyachko T. L., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. G. O reformirovanii sistemy finansirovaniya vuzov [On Reforming the Financing System for Universities]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2012, no. 7, pp. 133-146. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2012-7-133-146. (In Russ.)

5. Lavrov A. M. Byudzhetnaya reforma v Rossii: ot upravleniya zatratami k upravleniyu rezul’tatami [Budget Reform in Russia: From Managing Costs to Managing Results]. Moscow, KomKniga, 2005. (In Russ.)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3